21
Jul

Page and Screen – In Praise of Rupert Grint

» by admin in with No Comments

Liam Trim with the latest edition of ‘Page and Screen’…

With the all conquering Harry Potter franchise drawing to a close after a decade of record breaking box office figures and immeasurable sales of merchandise and DVDs, reams are being written attempting to sum up the reasons for the worldwide phenomenon. Recipes for success are being compiled and suggested as Warner Brothers and other studios look for the “next Potter” to lure audiences consistently to cinemas on a huge scale. Children’s authors are being assessed and targeted as execs wonder where to find the next J.K. Rowling. Meanwhile the super rich writer has launched a new website to continue the Potter brand, “Pottermore”, and has revealed that she has waited, perhaps wisely, until after the last film to publish several projects she’s been working on for some time since finishing The Deathly Hallows.

Some say that Rowling’s immense imagination and wonderful writing accounts for the success of the films. The sheer detail of the books helped create a wizarding universe that went beyond the plots. However up and down the country it’s easy to find English teachers, experts and ordinary readers that will think little of Rowling’s talent. Of course she clearly has an ability to create worlds and engaging plots but she is also reliant on influences and is far from a genius writer. Whilst I was sucked in by the books after reading them, unlike my school friends I only embraced The Philosopher’s Stone after seeing the film version, which convinced me Harry Potter wasn’t as childish as it sounded.

Perhaps the fact that Warner Brothers conceded artistic control to British based Heyman Productions ensured the appealing flavour of the series? There are no doubt many different reasons for the spellbinding effect Hogwarts has had on box offices internationally, but as someone who has grown up in the eye of a decade long magical storm, the Harry Potter films transcend the usual critical criteria. As rankings of the films appear all over the web, I have found myself reflecting on the franchise as a whole.

If I had to pick out one key reason for its success it would be the way the films have matured with their audience. Those behind the films deserve some credit for this but if anything they haven’t lived up to the darker depths of the books, until the final film if you believe the early reports from critics. It was Rowling’s masterstroke to pen seven stories that evolved in tone as well as plot. However watching the films has delivered the genuinely unique experience of seeing three child actors grow into young and talented adults, which mirrors the maturing mood of the stories.

Daniel Radcliffe and Emma Watson tend to hog the headlines. He has become a leading man and she has gone from prissy bookworm to stunning, sexy and intelligent model, capable of juggling a demanding degree from a top university with filming and an increasingly diverse career. Recently though, as Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows: Part 2 premiered in Trafalgar Square, the newspapers reserved special mention for the huge cheer that greeted Rupert Grint.

Grint has always been more than the long suffering ginger one. In the early films, when Radcliffe was excruciatingly awful at times in the lead role, Grint provided much needed comic relief and more, with a skill beyond his years. Respected film veteran John Hurt dubbed him a “born actor” and allegedly directors beyond Potter, such as Martin Scorsese, have predicted a bright future for him. In this early screen test, Grint is the clearly the most expressive of the famous trio, inhabiting his role even when he doesn’t have lines to read, unlike the blank faced Radcliffe and two dimensional Watson:

But then a combination of the stresses of the lifestyle change and scripts that let his character down reduced Grint to a predictable and subdued comic presence during the films in the middle of the series. Radcliffe and Watson both grew in confidence to take on more integral and convincing roles in the drama. The final film ought to have plenty of opportunities for Grint to go out with a bang big enough to showcase his true talent though, with the will-they-won’t-they romantic chemistry between Ron and Hermione finally coming to a head and several dramatic moments to sink his acting chops into. Grint has certainly demonstrated his promise elsewhere with performances in Driving Lessons alongside Julie Walters and wild teen drama Cherrybomb.

We’ve been through a lot with Harry, Hermione and Ron and got to know not only them, but a little of the actors that portray them, on the way to their final showdown with Lord Voldemort. Harry Potter will always be a great deal more than just a shadow hanging over the careers of Radcliffe, Watson and Grint. They will all try to shake it off and it will be remarkable if any of them completely succeed. I for one though have a feeling that out of all of them it is Rupert Grint we are still yet to see the best of. He was a lovable Ron but as someone else we haven’t heard of yet he is going to blow us away.


Original article found here: Page and Screen | July 21, 2011

View The Next Article

20
Jul

‘Harry Potter’ Star Rupert Grint: What’s Next?

» by admin in with No Comments

‘I’m not sure I’m going to miss it,’ actor tells MTV News of ‘Potter.’

Rupert Grint has always been the comic relief when it comes to the Big Three actors in “Harry Potter,” but with the final film opening in theaters Friday (July 15), he is ready to spread his wings and try out some new projects.

“Anything really different, really,” Grint replied when MTV News asked him what his plans are next. “Playing the same character for 10 years really does give you this thirst for new things. I’m not sure I’m going to miss it. I am looking forward to this kind of newfound freedom. Just see where it takes me.”

He certainly seems to be trying to get away from “Potter” as much as possible. Grint’s next project is his anti-war film “Comrade,” which began filming March 28 in Norway. Directed by Petter Næss and costarring David Kross, Florian Lukas and Stig Henrik Hoff, the movie tells the story of English and German pilots who are forced to work together to survive the brutal Norwegian winter; it is a very far cry from anything Grint has done in “Potter.”

After that, his next project is looking more and more likely to be “Eddie the Eagle,” a biopic about British skier Eddie Edwards, the first competitor to represent the U.K. in Olympic ski jumping. Though it still doesn’t have a writer or director attached, Grint is optimistic that production will get under way soon.

“It’s a story that I really like and it’s still in the working yet. I still have faith that it will happen,” he told MTV News. “It’s been in kind of development for a while, but yeah, hopefully it will come up.”

Of all the “Potter” stars, Grint has been the one to have the most big-screen experience. In 2002 he starred in the children’s comedy “Thunderpants,” then followed it up with 2006′s dramedy “Driving Lessons.” Somehow he managed to find time over the past few years during his busy “Potter” shooting schedule to squeeze out two 2010 releases as well: “Cherrybomb” and “Wild Target.”

And the fans respect him for it. When MTV’s Next Movie site ran a recent poll asking readers who they thought would be the most successful “Potter” star, Grint won by a whopping 43 percent. If that doesn’t work out, though, he always has a side career as an ice cream man.


Original article found here: mtv.com| July 18th, 2011

View The Next Article

9
Jul

I celebrated end of Potter filming by buying £60 Vauxhall Carlton

» by admin in with No Comments

Says Rupert Grint ( Who’s worth £24m )

WITH around £24million in the bank, Rupert Grint is one of Britain’s richest young men.

But the 22-year-old Harry Potter star doesn’t splash his galleons about like Premier League players his age.

The actor, who has enchanted audiences as wizard Ron Weasley for more than a decade, astonishingly confessed to The Sun that he still lives at home with mum and dad – even though he has his own pad in London for occasional stays.

There aren’t even any fancy cars for the homely Hertfordshire lad.

When filming wrapped on the final JK Rowling movie, Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 2, he treated himself to a £60 Vauxhall Carlton and headed off around Europe with mates in a “Wacky Rally”.

He said: “We did about nine countries, all the way to Barcelona. I went with James and Oliver Phelps, who play the twins, and we brought a mechanic along as well. It was a really good adventure. I do love cars but nothing too flash.”

In an exclusive interview with The Sun ahead of the final Potter film’s release on Friday, Rupert gave us a window into his unassuming life, where he is still close to sisters Georgina, 18, Samantha, 15 and Charlotte, 12, brother James, 21, and parents Nigel and Joanne.

Although he rarely splurges on himself, he says he can splash the cash on his family – sometimes on bizarre presents.

He said: “I have kind of got a miniature zoo. We have miniature pigs, donkeys, miniature hedgehogs. They are just smaller than the average hedgehog.

“I have quite a big family, I’m one of five and I have sisters who love animals.”

He has met the Queen and the family of President Obama so I ask Rupert which celebrity he has been most thrilled to meet.

The reply floors me.

“Alan Titchmarsh. Shakin’ Stevens came on to the set too. I only get star struck with really random people like Alan Titchmarsh and EastEnders actors,” he says.

“I met Alan at the Queen’s 80th when she had this big party in the Palace.

“I bumped into him. It’s not like I really watch Ground Force or anything like that.”

Never mind that the Queen and Prince Philip had been sitting right behind him or that Michelle Obama had visited the set with her daughters as a birthday surprise for one of them.

But if meeting heads of state doesn’t excite Rupert, surely there must have been magic in the air when he finally got to kiss co-star Emma Watson in the new film?

Ron Weasley and Emma’s character Hermione Granger finally spell out their feelings for each other in the series’ gripping finale by locking lips.

But Rupert says: “Neither of us were looking forward to it. It was a tricky one. That scene has been an anticipated moment, the relationship has built up from the early films.

“There was a pressure to get it right. I knew Emma when she was nine and we have closely watched each other grow up.

“So kissing this girl just seemed a strange thing to be doing, not right.”

Down-to-earth Rupert seems immune to the weaknesses of many young stars.

Daniel Radcliffe, who plays Harry, recently had to give up booze because his drinking had got out of control.

Rupert insists that he felt no such need to release the pressure with alcohol.

He said: “No, no, no, there has always been this anticipation for us to fall into that stereotype and it has never really been an issue for me.

“It’s because we film in Watford, which isn’t the most glamorous of spots. If we had filmed in America or something it could have been disastrous. I never felt any pressure. It was just fun really.” The constant and intense attention of fans makes this level-headed approach even more remarkable.

Rupert isn’t even offended by strangers heckling him.

He smiled and said: “People do call me Ron in the street. I have grown up with it, it has become my second name almost.

“I do answer to it. Or they call me Weasley or Ginger.”

Although he doesn’t enjoy people taking sneaky photographs while he’s in a restaurant.

He said: “There are moments when you don’t really want to do it, if you are having a meal and people are taking their camera phones out and taking pictures of you.

“You can spot them. They pretend to take pictures of their friend and they slightly offset the camera so they can get you.”

But he is grateful for some aspects of fame – all the fan mail and presents. For some reason he gets sent lots of pyjamas.

Odd encounters with obsessed fans also raise a smile.

He said with a laugh: “There was a time when I was in LA, I think, I met this guy who had a tattoo of me, Dan and Emma on his arm.

“He hadn’t quite got the resemblance. I looked like Anne Robinson.”

But how does he feel now this immense experience is over?

Rupert said: “It is weird to think it was the last one. There is a scene right at the end, after the battle, with the three of us on the bridge.

“I found that scene emotional, I still haven’t got used to it.”

But surely the post-Potter future is bright for Rupert, offering the chance to make different kinds of films?

In between the magical movies he has already appeared in low-budget projects including Wild Target, Cherrybomb, Driving Lessons and Thunderpants.

Coming up is Comrade, in which he plays a British airman shot down over Norway in the Second World War.

And Rupert has been lined up to play Eddie “The Eagle” Edwards in a biopic of the Winter Olympics sensation.

He says: “I want to keep on acting, definitely.”

We can only hope his career fares better than the dreams of Brit ski jumper Eddie – who came dead last in two events at the 1988 Winter Olympics.


Original article found here: The Sun| July 8th, 2011

View The Next Article

29
Jan

Exclusive Interview With Glenn Leyburn and Lisa Barros D’Sa

» by admin in with No Comments

The following is an exclusive interview with Cherrybomb directors Glenn Leyburn and Lisa Barros D’Sa!

Sam: The conflict of two guys fighting over one girl is a classic and well used plot device, and we’re familiar with it… we’ve seen it a lot, too. But Cherrybomb’s unique in how it handles the relationship between the characters because they are fighting with themselves , as well as each other. I mean, these characters have all these internal struggles going through, but they desperately need one another… like Michelle needs some validation from somebody, and Malachy and Luke need each other. What did you as directors to really accentuate that unique aspect of an otherwise familiar plot?
Lisa: Well honestly, I think it’s hard to say I think it’s fair to say, you know two guys fighting over one girl is a plot that we’ve seen. I guess there are few real original arch-typical stories, if you say the key is to defined what’s original and particular in the story and in the characters and to try to draw that out, in this case, I think that what we really loved about the story first of all was the friendship between the two boys, and the fact, the way that that’s drawn. At first, the aspect of warmth between, and affection in that relationship and also, I think the seeds of conflict were already there at the beginning even before Michelle comes along. I think that, you know I think that in beginning of the story before she arrived already makes an impact in their lives. We can see that, that their friendship is already under pressure, that it’s threatened from various different directions that their future is sort of pulling them apart already. And I think that was an interesting thing about the story because it raises the stakes in what’s gonna happen when Michelle arrives. As for Michelle, I think you know.. the characters…it’s lot to do with subtext of what’s going on, she appears very brash and confident, but quickly we realize that she’s vulnerable for various reasons. I think that’s a testament to a great performance from Kim that we’re always aware that there’s nuances…she doesn’t come across like a real harpieor a vixen. We’re always aware of that vulnerability in her and I think a lot of that, a lot of getting across that subtext from great performances by the actors.
Sam: Yeah, it was interesting how sweet she kind of seemed, even though she was supposed to appear brash, I liked that. We’ve been seeing some nice reviews for the movie, Empire Magazine is calling Cherrybomb, “Powerfully cinematic…” I don’t know if you guys have seen that one, and I’d have to agree.
Glenn and Lisa: Great, yeah.

Sam: Everything from the choice of color in each scene, the way the set was decorated, all these really bright vibrant colors, to the incorporation of the text messages kind of popping up on the screen like that. You give the film something larger than life. What aspect of the film was very important to you in order to keep it as cinematic as it turned out to be?
Glenn: Well, I think right from the very start we were quite keen to make the reality that the boys lived in slightly heightened. We, you know there have been a lot of films made in Belfast which are, you know, quite gritty, real about kind of grey war torn streets of Belfast. These films are great and there probably will be more films made like that and great ones. But what we wanted to do with this was something different. The Color was important just right from the very start. And you know we quite conscientiously sat down with the art director, and the costume designer, and our make- up artist, and everybody involved. And sort of talked at length about how we would use color in scene and bethat in whatever way the set was decorated or designed or whether that was through the wardrobe the central characters were wearing. One of the main things was that we wanted bright colors to pop against more monochromatic backgrounds, you know so it was keeping the background simple so that the characters themselves jumped out and were vibrant against that. And I suppose that’s actually relevant with Michelle, given her impact on the story when she arrives. And as far as the text messaging goes. You know I work, I have worked as a graphic designer, so obviously typography is something that really interests me, so, so, when we decided that the text messaging was going to be quite a central strand to the story telling. To think of creative ways to do that was important to us and we brought in the design company based in Belfast called Frank, who did a really great job, you know they’re very skilled in motion graphics. So we sort of went through different ideas and sort of came up with some ideas and we went backwards and forwards and tried a few things out. Yeah, just rather than, I guess, showing shots of screens of phones when people are texting which was something that we wanted to avoid. Trying to make a story as cinematic as possible was very important, in this I think our director of photography, Damien Elliot, did a good job with that as well. I think he worked really hard with lighting . And it brings everything together, I guess all the wardrobe, the set design, the graphics unifying all the elements I guess.
Lisa: Yes, and I think that is part of our job as directors, make sure that happens. That there’s a coherent world and playing with all those different, make sure that comes together. I think as well, the slightly heightened world is about reflecting what’s going on in the emotional lives of the characters during this weekend. During this game that’s taking place. Anything that’s happening in the outside world sort of falls away in terms of importance, so you know what we’re really focused on is heightened world this whole time.
Sam: Yeah, it’s really beautiful the color choice and the costume choice is really eye appealing. So, I think Empire Magazine had it right on that one.

Sam: Was there any significance to the large amount of tennis balls? They appear in many scenes from Crilly and Donna, to the ending pool scene, and we were just curious if there was something deeper involved with that? Cause They were just everywhere!
Lisa: Well they are everywhere. (laughs) The tennis balls, I think were part of the, a part of our idea for the Leisureplex background. I think, within, within that world, we wanted to really heighten, heighten that world…there’s a lot of patronizing in that, it’s almost like Eden that Crilly is trying to create this paradise. But actually, it really feels really hellish in a way. You know it’s this sense that you’re really direct…this lurid conformity against such , you know the chaos of young kids in this story. The young people in this story. Feels like quite a desirable thing. What else to say about the tennis balls, Glenn? They look lovely against the nice blue water in the pool.

Glenn: I suppose it’s trying to treat the vision in a painterly way it’s using objects that you dress into the set in that painterly way, and you know splashes of color and patternizations.
Sam: Yeah, it’s neat looking, it kind of struck us when we were thinking about it. Was there a lot of adlibbing on the set, or did the cast basically stick to the script?
Lisa: Was there a lot of ad-libbing did you say?
Sam: Yeah.
Lisa: Um, I don’t know if there was adlibbing so much to honest with you. There are obviously a few little bits and pieces and bright moments that you…that you end up, in the final film. But, by in large, I think it was mostly the original script.
Glenn: Yeah, I think it was mostly the original script. There are a few bits and pieces I guess which weren’t scripted. What you’ve got the kind of thing spontaneous things as they happen and kind of run with them a little bit. But yeah, by in large we stuck to the script. Eventually, it’s the way we work really. Some directors work with a very loose script and in fact…you know…let the actors provide the whole scene, but that’s not really the way we work. We like, we like to be always aware of an unusual and interesting things that can appear. But, it’s not really…
Lisa: Yes, I…things do arise and you have to be ready, you know new things, new moments can arise as you’re working with the actors and, um, you always have to listen out for those things cause they can be really wonderful little details and moments here and there that are just perfect cause they understand the characters really well. And so we’ll never be closed off to things like that. But basically we stuck to the original script. We did a good bit of rehearsal before we started with the actors, so there might have been little changes here and there along the way. It’s quite hard to remember actually, cause you’ve got to remember the scenes that you see playing out…at that stage a long time ago now.
Glenn: Yeah

Sam: How long was the rehearsal?
Lisa: We rehearsed for a few days beforehand and, um, it was actually I think about a week before we went on set that we had the three leads in a room at the same time. They all came over to Belfast and met each other, and we all worked together really then for a few days.
Glenn: I wouldn’t have said that it was a full week because during that time, there was a week that they were in pre-production with us. But, during that time as well, they had to go up for make-up, hair test, and wardrobe tests. So, I don’t think that whole week was all rehearsal time, but yeah, there was a few days.
Lisa: And there wasn’t too much. In some ways you do rehearse the scene a little bit, but a lot of it was about sitting with the script and talking about the characters and tracing their emotional journey through the film. You know tracing their relationships through the film, and just really talking between us and with the actors about all of those things and what the big emotional turning points were. Cause obviously when you’re shooting you’re not shooting chronologically so you know it’s quite hard to find where that certain emotional moment is. So, if you’ve done that sort of work before, you’ve had those conversations and discussed that stuff in detail. I think it helps, you know to pin point precisely if you’re going into a scene that’s completely out of context, pin point, you know for the actors exactly where they are in that moment. And still we did rehearse scenes a little bit but you don’t really want to over rehearse because you want to keep a certain freshness whenever you’re actually shooting those scenes.

Sam: Ok. Rumor has it there was a deleted scene in which Malachy had to vomit. Can you tell us more about that, like what was he doing? And were there any deleted scenes that you wish would have made it into the final cut?
Glenn: Yeah, there was a scene. Actually, the first scene that we shot was Malachy, yeah throwing up. But that was just, that was really the night after he had gone out and painted the garage doors.
Lisa: Yeah, so you know when you see…there’s a scene where you see him looking at his sleeve and he’s got the red paint on it in the bathroom? That was, we sort of shot it….we didn’t actually shoot him actually being sick. It was more the aftermath of that.
Sam: Good.
Glenn: Yeah, the aftermath of that. There was no vegetable soup or anything involved.
Lisa: You’re not missing anything.

Sam: Were there any deleted scenes that you wish would have made it?
Lisa: Well, you know we were there editing the film with our brilliant editor Nick Emerson. I think you make a lot of difficult choices in the edit, and one of the things that you have to keep in mind is that it’s about the shape of the film as a whole and plus there might be little bits that you love, it might not really, it might not really help a real shape, or rhythm, or pace and if they are not essential in working with that overall structure sometimes it’s better that they go even if themselves, they are really nice scenes.
Glenn: There are a few deleted scenes actually there’s a deleted scene with Michelle and Donna after Michelle has found out. So that’s quite, a…I’m sure that will pop up on the DVD. Yeah, there are a few deleted scenes ok, yeah.
Lisa: Yes I think there might be one or two to look out for in the extras.
Sam: Oh excellent. I’d love to see a confrontation between Michelle and Donna.

Sam: We heard that the love scene between Malachy and Michelle was shot as a continuous 10 minutes. Like, you didn’t stop. And if this is true did Rupert and Kim improvise… like the laughter that was during that scene, or was it in the script? Because it was a little bit of him laughing there.
Lisa: We didn’t shoot it all continuously because, well I mean it’s two different shots. You sort of seein the way that scene plays out there are two different angles that we used. So, each part of it was actually shot in a very self-contained way, quite short parts.Bit by Bit. Actually, most of it was pretty choreographed. I mean those scenes when you shoot them they are mechanical, you know sort of the actions in order 1, 2, 3… we’ll talk to you about a bit, and then we’ll move to the next shot, etc. So it really happens a bit like that, especially in that scene you put the pieces together afterwards and then hopefully it flows really nicely into sequence, which I think we were really happy with the way that one did. I mean, things like that laugh, you know, I don’t think it was necessary in the script. But, we’ve certainly discussed the mood of the piece. The fact that there’s really nice intimacy there, you now the thing about that scene is that it’s sort of beyond the game really in a way that we really see the characters connecting with each other there’s genuine feeling and affection there. And I think both the actors really got into that beautifully within the performances and I think that nice little intimate part with little bits of laughter is really part of that feeling.
Sam: Yeah, that was a really sweet scene. Also, Rupert has said that during that scene so didn’t know where to put his hands? Did you guys have to direct him on what to do, or did you just let him figure it out.
Lisa: I don’t think it’s really fair to let actors figure things like that out for themselves. You just look at them and say, “yeah, let’s see what happens.”It’s very tricky, that. We tried to, you know, we knew specifically what shots we wanted and what we knew specifically what shots we wanted and what we wanted to see. So, we were able to just, you know, just sort of direct the actors along those lines.

Sam: Ok, was Malachy always ginger in your mind, like, or in the script when you read through, or did he become one when you cast Rupert?
Lisa: I don’t think we were, we really didn’t have anything specific as hair color for any of the characters, I would say. We knew it was more an internal thing. We knew what they would feel like, what kind of people they were. And so, you know, that was really what we were looking for that sort of essence. You know, just that sort of mood of the character. And so it really was by chance I think that it ended up we had a red head, a brunette, and a blonde. I think it worked out really well. It’s a nice combination!

Sam: Yeah, it helped with the color balance you guys are going for too….maybe if it was inadvertent.
Lisa: That was a happy serendipitous thing that happened for our color pallet definitely.


Sam: In your personal opinion, how do you think Rupert will fair in the industry as his career begins to move away from Harry Potter?
Glenn: I think he’ll do very well.  I mean I think he’s a very talented actor and I think he will be brilliant.
Lisa: I have absolute no doubt that Rupert’s gonna have a fantastic career.  (Glenn co-signs) He’s such a talented guy, I mean, he’s such an instinctive, intelligent actor and we sort or knew that was going to be the case and we really were blown away by his amazing performances as Malachy. So, I think, you know, the sky’s the limit for Rupert. I think it’s going to be very exciting to watch him do just that.
Glenn: Yeah Absolutely.
Sam: Awesome!

Sam: Glenn has said that Italian actor Marcello Mastroianni, I don’t know if I pronounced that right because I’ve only ever looked up pictures of him. He’s been an inspiration to you.  In what ways? Because, I mean, you guys are on different ends of the film making world.
Glenn: In filmmaking, I would say maybe, not necessarily Marcello Mastroianni but I guess the Fellini is always a director I absolutely love. The director I really love, Marcello Mastroianni would have been, perhaps his muse.  He’s often in his movies, so um, but sartorially certainly,  his clothes I admire greatly. I admire the films that he’s in and Fellini is one of my favorite directors of all time. And his films have a heightened reality about them as well, and can be very visually strong.  So, yeah he’s definitely an influence.

Sam: What about you, Lisa. Are there any other filmmakers, or actors, or artists that have influenced your work?
Lisa: Well yeah, I think there are lots of them in terms of filmmakers…this question’s always hard because there are so many. One of my favorite filmmakers is Cassavettes … he’s a fantastic director, um, things he did like The Killing of a Chinese Bookie, he’s always one of my favorites, I just love the performances that he gets from the actors in his films.  They just seem so raw and real and I think no other director who manages to do that to that degree.  Um, there’s also a director I love called Chris Marker who’s short film La Jetee is one of my favorite movies, an amazing film! Check it out. It’s actually about an half hour long and it’s entirely shot in stills. Hardly any moving Images. Beautiful.
Glenn: La Jetee was a little bit of an influence, and Jean-Luc Godard was a big influence for me as well…French New Wave. And Godard’s Film Alphaville and Le Jetee were films that influenced our first short film “The Eighteenth Electricity Plan”…And…Have you see “The Eighteenth Electricity Plan.”
Sam: No. I was looking for it, and we were actually going to ask a question about it. Is there any way for us to get a link for it?
Lisa: We’re gonna put a link to it on our blog, actually, so it should be up there soon.
Glenn: In the next week I would say, we’ll have it up. You could check that out. But, certainly yeah, Chris Marker and Jean Luc Godard and The French New Wave are always an influence. And I guess in this film…for Cherrybomb…were Jules et Jim which is a Francoise Truffaut film, I think that was definitely an influence. And also um…
Lisa: It’s the real classic coming of age movies, I think, like “The Last Picture Show”, was a real touchstone for us
Glenn: It’s a great movie
Lisa: I take influences from all over the place and not necessarily just from movies.
Glenn: Yeah, I mean, we we have a very broad spectrum of things that we’re interested in. We love cinematographers, painters, musicians, all those things. Writers, influence, all of these influence the works, so it’s not necessarily all about filmmakers. But these are the filmmakers we do like anyway
Sam: Excellent.

Sam: What’s your favorite memory about working with Rupert, specifically?
Lisa: Oh , there are lots of favorite memories of working with Rupert. I think one of the first really, just discovering. You know, you don’t know how someone who’s been a film star all their lives, really, you didn’t really know what they were going to be like or how they’ve been affected as a human being by that sort of experience. But he was such a lovely, friendly person. And, just a real joy to be around. And, such a great sense of humor. We just had a lot laughs about things right from the very beginning.
Glenn: Yeah, and we had great fun making the flim. I think we’ve said that before, but we were working with a great bunch of people, and working with Rupert specifically was really good. One of the things that sticks out in my head, that was maybe the time, with Rupert and Robbie were doing the things where they’re supossed to be smoking joints. During that scene it wasn’t scripted that they would laugh,_but they kept lauging and corpsing. And that was at the time, obviously on the film set, you know, there’s not much time to do things, but all the crew were lauging , it was kind of infectious. We were all kind of rolling around laugjhing at the situation that was in front of us. And that actually made it into the cut of the film, you see the end of the that scene, where they burst out laughing, that laugh is genuine. And we kept it in in the cut.
Sam: Rupert’s a notorious corpser.
Glenn: Yeah, we know that.- all laugh-

Sam: There were so many things about this film that I liked. The set choices were very appealing, and made me feel like I was int this place, and this environment that I had never really been to before. But also, the relationship between Malachy and Luke was complicated and sweet and very enjoyable to watch. What were your favorite things about the film?
Glenn: Are we talking about different scenes?
Sam: Yeah, well favorite aspects maybe.
Lisa: Well for me, well I always really loved, and still really love to watch having seen it so many times now, is I love the realtiphsip between the three characters. I just love that, it feels like they know each other, it feels like the two boiys are friends, and by the end, I always feel like I believe in what’s going on and the dynamic between them. And that’s these great performances from the three. That’s what, I love that. And one I ‘m always very fond of, is the party scnee at the end. Where the track She Brings the Rain is playing. It kind of adds to the atmosphere really on, because we had the track really early on, but, on a early version of the track from David Holmes. I think we envisioned that, that certain atmosphere of it, is really ended up on screen. And that’s quite rare, because things evolve so much along the way.
Glenn: Yeah, I think that would be my favorite scene in the film as well. I mean, that scene has also been pretty interesting because when we were shooting it, it was scheduled for it to shoot that in about 4 or 5 hours, and we had quite a lot of things set aside to shoot the scene cause it would be quite complicated. But an actual fact that often happens in a film, it’s that you can be quite pushed for time. And you can run behind and time can get squeezed, and I think we ended up having 45 minutes to shoot that. And it must be said, had we not managed to get the right shots we would have gone back to do it, but we had 45 minutes at the end of the day, and we had quite clearly worked in our heads, the choreography of the whole thing. So we were able to do it quite quickly and, you know, if you look at the scene now, and if we had spend, you know, two days doing it, we probably wouldn’t have gotten it to look any better, or feel any better feel than it did. You know, it’s one of those magic things in a short space of time. So yeah, that’s a scene we will always enjoy.
Sam: Wow. 45 minutes.
Glenn: Yeah, about 45 minutes.

Sam: Would you ever want to work with Rupert again in the future?
Lisa: Yeah, definitely, I hope we will work together again at some point, before too long!
Glenn: Yeah, hopefully before too long. You know, we have some other project, and it’d be fantastic to have Rupert involved, absolutely.

Sam: Ice Cream Man, our site, was involved in quite a large fan effort involved to get the word out about Cherrybomb. What impact has that had for you guys?
Lisa: Oh, it’s been amazing for us to watch that, I mean, from the beginning, we’ve been completely astonished and delighted how much you guys have been involved with supporting the film right from when we were shooting to when we went to the different festivals, it was basically people there who had travelled so far just to come and support the movie. And we’ve just appreciated it so much, and when the petition kicked off to get Cherrybomb distribution, well, you know we just… have to thank you guys , I mean, look at where we are today! It’s pretty amazing! Cherrybomb is in cinemas in UK and Ireland and perhaps hopefully the world beyond after that! And you know, you guys have been a great part of that, so we thank you hugely for that.
Glenn: Yeah, absolutely, I mean, as first-time filmmakers, we couldn’t have wanted for anything more, it’s absolutely fantastic, all the support that you’ve shown us. So, yeah, that has been amazing and way beyond our wildest notions.
Sam: Did anybody else involved in the movie say anything about the fan effort, like did any of the cast members notice how much we were trying to get the world out and everything?
Lisa: I think everybody has really been aware of it. I know Rupert has been incredibly grateful and I think, I don’t know if he’s talked to you or passed on messages to you guys about that, but I think, you know what he’s like, he’s a very modest guy, and I think he’s just really, he still … it that he’s got so many people with affection for him and his work. And the fans get behind it, and he immensely grateful for that and absolutely appreciates it. And the other young actors as well.
Glenn: Yeah, absolutely. I mean, they’re probably in a similar position to us, with this being their first feature film. I mean well, Robbie has been in a couple of other pieces…
Lisa: …as has Kim, I mean, you’ve seen the films, but I think they’ve been really amazed that you know, you guys, you’re Rupert’s fans, but you also got equally behind all of them, and they’ve been really chuffed by that and they’ve really enjoyed that and appreciated that.
Sam: Well the film is great and they did a great job, and we wanted everybody to know that!
Lisa and Glenn: *laughter*
Sam: It wasn’t hard to get behind everybody, it was pretty easy, cause we really liked what you guys came up with.
Glenn: Yeah, that is very kind

Sam: Do you guys have any other projects in the works that you’re looking forward to?
Lisa: Yes, we’ve got a film that we’re hoping to shoot this summer, actually, it’s a film called Good Vibrations, and it’s a story about the punk scene here in Northern Ireland during the 70ies, and told the life of a very charismatic one-eyes record shop owner called Hooley.
Glenn: It’s a true story
Lisa: It’s a true story and it’s a brilliantly darkely comedic film with lots of great music from that aera, and we’ve posted information about it on our block, and there’s a Facebook site for it you can check out, called Good Vibrations.

Glenn: I hope you’ve been enjoying the site – lots more to come over the weekend and beyond. It’s a very exciting day for all of us as Cherrybomb hits the cinemas in the UK and Ireland – well done to everyone for all their hard work in making it happen!


Ice Cream Man would like to thank Glenn and Lisa for sitting down ICM and staffer Sam for this interview! This interview is property of ICM. Please only link back to this, do not reproduce on any other website. Thank you.

21
Dec

Where You’ve Seen Him: Rupert Grint

» by admin in with No Comments

The redheaded actor had never appeared on film until he made his debut as Ron Weasley in 2001′s “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.” Since being cast in the world’s biggest franchise, he’s made smaller movies in Britain, including the 2006 dramedy “Driving Lessons,” starring as an awkward teenager opposite Julie Walters, the actress who plays Ron’s mother, Molly, in the “Potter” series. He also played a rebellious Irish teen in the 2009 drama “Cherrybomb,” which played on the festival circuit.


Original article found here: The LA Times | October 28th, 2010

View The Next Article

20
Dec

Harry Potter star struggles with ‘low budget’ transition

» by admin in with Comments Off

Rupert Grint had trouble adjusting to small film sets after working on the Harry Potter movies.

The flame-haired actor – who plays wizard Ron Weasley in the long-running series based on the novels of J. K. Rowling – was confused when he worked on British projects Cherrybomb and Wild Target because he had been used to big budget environments.

He told Total Film magazine: “It was quite an adjustment going from Harry Potter to doing the low-budget films. It threw me a little – it’s just such a different way of making a film.

“But I prefer the pace of low budgets because it’s much more in the moment.”

The 22-year-old star also reveals he is due to star in a biopic about British ski jumper Eddie ‘The Eagle’ Edwards, but is nervous about it because he has never strapped on a pair of skis in his life.

He said: “It’ll be great if it happens but we’ll see. I’m looking forward to the challenge because he’s such a big character.

“I’ve never skied in my life, so I guess that might be a problem – but I’m sure I’ll pick it up.”


Original article found here: The Sydney Morning Herald | October 5th, 2010

View The Next Article

5
Dec

Robert Sheehan – Little White Lies Interview

» by admin in with No Comments

The Cherrybomb star talks about finding his feet alongside some of cinema’s most distinguished faces.


Robert Sheehan is best known for his character Nathan in the E4 teen drama Misfits. He has, however, been appearing in feature films for seven years after his breakthrough performance in critically acclaimed Irish film, Song For a Raggy Boy. His new film, Cherrybomb, will shortly be followed by Seasons of the Witch, which sees him sharing the screen with Stephen Lee, Ron Pearlman, Stephen Graham and Nicolas Cage.

LWLies: So you’re and up and coming actor, what’s next for you; LA?

Sheehan: No, not to live there. I’d gladly work there. I find you go where the work takes you, you let yourself go and see where you end up, and I’ve been lucky to end up in a few very nice places over the course of it. But yeah, I was over their last May for two weeks. I went on my own so it was mostly business and a bit of holiday. I was doing meetings 10 to 5 every day, general meetings which are fucking futile and pointless in my opinion. But they lead to nice things I suppose. One was really cool because I sat down for an hour with Christopher Nolan and just chatted about stuff.

You can’t get a lot better than Christopher Nolan. You’ve got a film with Nicholas Cage coming out right? Was that through that sort of meeting?

No, that was was general auditioning in London, and yeah we shot for four months in Austria and Hungary and I don’t know when it’s going to come out, it’s got postponed. I think it’s just them being cautious because there’s a lot of Nic Cage in the cinema right now.

You’ve been doing this for a while now though, we can remember seeing you in A Song For A Raggy Boy back in the day. Have you ever had, or do you have, concerns about getting into this industry?

I think you can’t control what kind of person you become. You have no choice there, you just do what you do, do what you like. Speaking on a personal point of view, or a philosophical level or whatever, I think it’s a fantastic way to spend your life. I’m very happy to be doing it, and want to keep doing it, and want to do more and more and more, because you get rusty very quickly, and you can get complacent very quickly. It’s a constant fight against that.

So you’ve experienced that in your career already?

Yeah because you can do a character and you can do it for several months, and then you stop and you have to think ‘Well what am I going to do now,’ and you’ve got to really learn how to do something else.

How difficult to you find that, to find new roles and climb into new skins, is that a struggle?

Yeah, it’s a struggle in the sense that you can go from ‘I’m never going to find this character’ to all of a sudden going, ‘Yeah that’ll work for me.’ It can happen very quickly. But there’s been so many brilliant characters in the past, so there’s been a lot of inspiration there, and it’s not just guessing in your own head, you can go away and look at stuff. I find that watching good actors provides inspiration.

Take Cherrybomb, who did you have in your head for that?

I kind of had a bit of a Jim Morrison thing in my head for that character. I remember seeing The Doors and seeing real footage of Jim Morrison, and he had this great sway to him. Those little things, as soon as you confirm those in your head then you can make a character, which I suppose to the outside eye is just me doing my thing, but in my head you’re creating a character.

Is there much of your personality in Luke? Did you find it difficult to find him?

No, it was quite easy to find him, the ideas came quite easily. It was fun because it was easy.

What made it so easy?

Just because I had quite a clear mind of what I was doing, which you don’t always have with characters, and everybody was very at ease on set all the time. It was very very laid back, relaxed, chilled out.

Cherrybomb is a very hermetic narrative and you spend a lot of time developing the inter-relationships. Were they something that came quite naturally between you and Kimberly [Nixon] and Rupert [Grint]? Did you spark off immediately as soon as you met?

I think there was a reasonably immediate spark off as soon as we met, I mean the banter started up pretty quickly. People strike a dynamic, and it was similar because it was me being mouthy, Rupert being lovely and sweet and himself, and Kim in the middle telling me how much of a tosser I am. So it was great. What I’m trying to say is that we got very comfortable with each other and that needed to happen, which doesn’t always happen.

There’s been a bit of controversy in the right wing press about the film’s themes like drug use. Were you conscious about sensationalising it?

No, I don’t think it needed that. The film is quite a stylised version of reality. I like that, I like how cool it looks and how visual it is, but I don’t think it’s completely true to reality in the way the drugs are shown. It doesn’t matter, it’s not trying to tell you any message or anything. That’s the thing, it’s not trying to impose a ‘this is what it’s like’ thing on anyone. There’s no morality to it. I like films that just happen and don’t really try and explain to the audience.


Original article found here: Little White Lies | April 23rd, 2010

View The Next Article

5
Dec

Weasley Does It: Rupert Grint Interview

» by admin in with No Comments

Ron Weasley’s down-to-earth alter-ego on growing up and getting old…


Rupert Grint has managed to squeeze several movies in between filming on the Harry Potter saga, with the coming-of-age drama Cherrybomb – which sees his character having a wild weekend – only the latest. We chat to the 21 year old about teenage rebellion and what he’s looking forward to the most once Harry has wrapped…

SKY MOVIES MAGAZINE: Were you consciously trying to move away from Ron Weasley with your recent non-Harry Potter projects? You played a rebellious teen in Cherrybomb and a young hitman in Wild Target…
RUPERT GRINT: I don’t know, I don’t think about it really. At the moment I’m still doing all the Potter things, and I’m lucky to get to do other stuff in between.

SMM: Could you relate more to your Cherrybomb character, who gets up to some typical teenage behaviour?
RG: Yes. The fact that you can look back and relate it to things that you’d actually done yourself – I’m much older than my character in it, he’s 16 ­– really helps.

SMM: Did you miss out on that teenage phase because of Harry Potter?
RG: No, I don’t think I missed out too much. And I don’t really regret it. It’s been a really good experience making the films. I’ve had a good time.

SMM: Is it a shock going to work on a low-budget film like Cherrybomb after the pampered world of Harry Potter?
RG: Well, it was quite scary going to a different place, but the biggest difference was just the pace they worked at. It was much quicker and it was much more exciting, actually.

SMM: Do you get recognised everywhere you go now?
RG: I do get recognised quite a bit now but everyone’s really nice so it’s quite easy to deal with. But still a bit strange.

MM: What are you most looking forward to with the last two films?
RG: I really loved the book. There’s a lot of great stuff in it. Particularly in Part 2 – that’s what I’m most looking forward to because that’s where all the action is. And the “20 years after” thing – that’s going to be interesting. I’m pretty sure they’ll age us up for that. I can’t really see them doing that with CG…

SMM: So what’s next after Potter? Have you been offered roles in Hollywood?
RG: There’s been a few things about but it’s quite tight with the Harry Potter thing. Usually we only get a few months in between. Something like Cherrybomb only took four weeks to film so it was easy just to sort of slide in. We’ll see what happens when this is all done.

Words: Matt Mueller

This interview first appeared in Sky Movies Magazine Sep/Oct 2010


Original article found here: Sky Movies Magazine | September/October 2010


View The Next Article

1
Dec

Rupert Grint opens up about topless sex scene

» by admin in with No Comments

The 21-year-old actor, who plays Ron in the successful franchise, said he didn’t work out in preparation for a sex scene in forthcoming film Cherrybomb.

“No, I really wasn’t that worried about it,” he told Metro exclusively at last night’s after party for the British Independent Film Awards. “So, no working out for me.”

Cherrybomb – which also stars James Nesbitt, Angus, Thongs And Perfect Snogging’s Kimberley Nixon and Robert Sheehan – is set in post-Troubles Belfast.

Rupert plays a Northern Irish teenager who takes drugs and is featured in intimate bedroom scenes with Nixon’s character.

The film’s poster shows him lying topless on a lilo, with the tagline: “Two guys. One girl. Game on.”

Grint said he’d spent the night catching up with co-stars from Harry Potter at the star-studded bash and was still busy working on the final installment of the film.

“I really hope to keep on acting after Harry Potter finishes but everything’s up in the air at the moment,” he added.

Grint looked determined to shake off his clean cut image at the film bash last night as he was spotted downing shots.

An onlooker said: “I can’t believe it. He seems so well-behaved on screen. That boy can certainly hold his liquor!”

Harry Potter co-star Daniel Radcliffe also stripped off in Equus in the West End.


Original article found here: Metro UK | December 7th, 2009

View The Next Article

30
Nov

Rupert Grint Gets Bloody For ‘Cherrybomb’ – Check Out Exclusive Photos!

» by admin in with No Comments

In the space between Harry Potter films, the young actors who play the trio of Harry, Ron, and Hermione have been trying to cram as much non-wizarding world work on their resumes as possible — to prevent typecasting when they grow up. Dan Radcliffe, for instance, is starring in the controversial play “Equus” on Broadway. But Rupert Grint, who plays Harry’s best bud Ron Weasley, is trying to go Radcliffe one step further — by taking on violent roles in the independent films “Wild Target” (which he just started) and “Cherrybomb” (which he just finished).

Rupert Grint in 'Cherrybomb'

“My character Malacy [in 'Cherrybomb'] works at a leisure center in Belfast,” Grint explained. “It’s not really a proper job, but this girl Michelle is my boss’ daughter. She’s really exotic and fashionable and she gets his attention, along with his friend Luke, and she starts this crazy competition thing between them.”

In order to impress Michelle (who is played by Kimberley Nixon), the two guys start trying to one-up each other, first by going to a club and trying to dance with her, then by pulling stunts like stealing a car, and then things escalate from there.

“Usually, Malachy doesn’t get the girl,” Grint said. “Luke is more of the ladies’ man, but he’s a bit more dodgy. Malachy isn’t a geek, he’s a bit of a thug, but he starts off as basically a good kid. He goes to work, he has a good relationship with his parents, but he’s got some bad influences, so he gets into a bit of trouble.”

Because Grint’s character is trying to be a bad boy to impress the girl, he loses himself in that — “she likes that, so she likes him.” Stealing a car wasn’t that big of a leap, especially because all he has to do is swipe the keys. “Why do my movies always involve illegal things with cars?” he laughed, referring to his last independent film “Driving Lessons” and the infamous flying car from Harry Potter. “I’m not that into driving that I’d ever actually steal a car,” he laughed. “Never.”

Robert Sheehan, Rupert Grint and Kimberly Nixon in 'Cherrybomb'

Grint got a “little love scene” that’s a little more adult than the one he had in “Driving Lessons,” he said, “which was quite awkward to film, with the whole crew watching. They’re in bed!” But the real adult subject matter, Grint said, is what happens afterwards — which he didn’t want to spoil. “It gets quite serious,” he said. “It gets a bit crazy. Really violent and out of hand and lethal at the end.”

But delving into the more mature material wasn’t the hardest part for Grint — it was the Belfast accent. “It’s a mishmash of all sorts of different accents,” he said. “I got the vocal coach to make me a CD of all the lines and I put that on my iPod, and that really helps, to learn the vowel sounds. Otherwise, I’d pick it up from the crew, since they were all local.”

Only having one week of rehearsals also put the pressure on. “On Harry Potter, we do a scene every few days, and this was like 12 scenes a day,” Grint said. “It’s a much tougher shoot, really, and quite tiring, but it’s good, to be at this much faster pacce. I prefer it to the waiting around. You’re always moving about. And at least I’m playing such a cool, different character that I’ve never done before. It’s nice to get to act like you’re more confident, even for a little bit.”

Do you want to see Rupert Grint in non-Harry Potter roles? What kind of role would you like to see him play?


View original article here: MTV Movies Blog | September 29th, 2008

View The Next Article